Campaign Finance Reform - Take 2

June 9th, 2005

It’s time to get active, and contact your state senators, and let them know to stand up for campaign spending limits. The US Supreme Court made a mistake when they declared that spending money is speech. In Buckley v. Valeo, they said that spending money on a campaign is free speech. Oddly, in the same case, they said that donating money to your candidate is not free speech.

So, basically, if you are a private citizen, spending money on your candidate is not free speech, but if you are a candidate, spending money is free speech. Boneheaded.

Aside from the obvious hypocrisy contained within this decision, they also ignored the simple fact that money is not speech - it is property - property that you trade for other property or services. Also, you can own money, in the same way that you can own a house, or an SUV - both not free speech - neither is money.

Limiting what candidates can spend on a campaigns doesn’t limit speech, it limits the ability to spend money on goods and services, which congress has full rights to regulate (See the US Constitution - Article I. Section 8 for example).

This stuff seems pretty simple, and I really struggle to see what these guys were thinking in 1976.

Anyway, click the link and tell your senators to sign on to a friend-of-the-court brief urging the Court to hear Landell v. Sorrell.

http://pirg.org/democracy/democracy.asp?id=174&id3=CFR&id4=ES&

Laura’s Cry

June 8th, 2005

Laura Bush got up one Saturday night at the White House correspondents dinner and put on a show. This previously camera shy first lady, stood in front of a large live audience and television cameras and performed a so-called comedy routine. Who would have thought, and who would have guessed that she would get some laughs too. I admit, as I watched I giggled a little bit at the attempt, I did not think though that the jokes were a laughing matter. Then I got to thinking (Danger, Will Robinson!), what inspired Laura’s bold act? I have come up with several prospective reasons.

She is trying to muster up some white house support as Bush’s domestic policies are being challenged (No Child Left Behind) and the war in Iraq looks more and more like Vietnam with no end in sight. If this is the case, I guess you cannot blame her for her effort. I think this option is unlikely, however. Who is Bush trying to win over? He cannot run for office again, so it matters not who dislikes and disagrees with him.

O.K. so hmmm, what else could have spawned the routine?

Laura Bush, being the good wife that she is, is covering for the fact that her husband cannot tell a joke. This reception is supposed to show the lighter and funnier side of the President. Maybe during rehearsal, George W. got bank stares and an occasional chuckle from the eager-to-impress-brown-noser in the audience. While this would be an altogether great reason, I have to discard it. In defense of Mr. Bush, I think he is quite funny. Haven’t you watched any of his speeches? Hilarious I tell you, the man was born with the gift of a comedian. More than cover for a man that is not funny, I believe that Laura’s intention was to purposely make the audience laugh at her hubby. If you can’t beat ‘em, join ‘em, right?

As I sat pondering the root of Laura’s speech I asked myself, “Was Laura’s speech really cry for help? I then responded, “Self, I think you may be onto something!” Think about it. I mean, come on, that speech was more of a cry for help than Robin Givens talking to Barbara Walters about Mike Tyson.

I will undertake the responsibility of decoding Laura’s words so you can better understand her plea. “Nine o’clock, Mr. Excitement here is sound asleep.” Translation: He is dreadfully boring. “His answer to all problems at the ranch is, cut it down with a chainsaw.” Translation: He is crazy and destructive. “Ladies and gentlemen, I am a desperate housewife.” Hello, need she say more.

Why hasn’t anyone run to her aid, didn’t anyone hear her? No, instead they dessert the poor woman in the Whitehouse with him all the while giving her rave reviews of her performance. I can see her eyes rolling now, Poor thing. What will it take for American’s to help a woman in need? I know that she coyly voiced her cry for help, unlike Ms. Givens. Robin came out and said that she was scared, and was then trampled by the papers and public opinion. Well, Laura I guess we will see you in 10 years discussing your trials and tribulations with Oprah.

Good morning my neighbors!

June 4th, 2005

Well, I finally did it. Here is my new blog. I will probably not publish very often, but at least something is here :) Check back every so often and see what’s up.

Update 2005-07-05 - I just saw the movie I was quoting there in the title (Coming to America), and realized that the quote was wrong! Well it has been corrected now :)


Close
E-mail It